Tampilkan postingan dengan label India. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label India. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 22 April 2012

Legends of wheels Part III: Lee Iacocca

Following up with Legends of Wheels Part I: Sergio Marchionne
http://boyracer.blogspot.com/2012/04/legends-of-wheels-part-isergio.html
and Legends of Wheels Part II: Carlos Ghosn
http://boyracer.blogspot.com/2012/04/legends-of-wheels-part-ii-carlos-ghosn.html

The third part is on a person who is currently 88 years old and still as much in the news as any of his counterparts. Lee Iacocca known mostly for the Success for Ford Mustang and Chryslers turnaround, is not just another American fake like those thousands out there selling outrageous reality tv shows but the man who made his mark by giving results.



The Man

Iacocca is the former chairman of Chrysler Corporation and he also became a passionate advocate of U.S. business exports during the 1980s.

Beginning his career at Ford,  Iacocca successfully developed many automobiles at Ford, including the Ford Mustang. Ultimately, he became the president of Ford Motor Company but his shaky relationship with Henry Ford II forced him out of the company. But Ford’s loss was Chrysler’s gain and Iacocca was not without a job long. Iacocca engineered a transformation that brought Chrysler from the brink of bankruptcy to the most envied of the Big Three automakers.


He served as President and CEO of Chrysler from 1978 and additionally as chairman from 1979, until his retirement at the end of 1992.

At Ford

In 1960 Iacocca was named Ford's vice-president, car and truck group; in 1967, executive vice-president; and in 1970-1978, president. Iacocca participated in the design of several successful Ford automobiles, most notably the Ford Mustang, the Lincoln Continental Mark III, the Ford Escort and the revival of the Mercury brand in the late 1960s, including the introduction of the successful Mercury Cougar and Mercury Marquis.


The 1965 Ford Mustang was unveiled to hundreds of reporters by Lee Iacocca at the New York World's Fair on April 13, 1964. The Mustang had been championed by Iacocca, an ambitious car salesman who rose through the ranks on smarts and self-assurance to become head of the Ford division. Many would argue that the Plymouth Barracuda was launched full two weeks before the Mustang but the way Iacocca's marketing blitz was so full of lights, the Barracuda was sidelined even being as succesfull as the Mustang. Ford was also quick on going back to Lee Iacocca for a special edition Mustang named after the man himself.


Reviving Chrysler

The 70's had started on an excellent note for the Big three. The makers of Huge cars were reliant on big muscle cars which sold like hot cakes. Gas was cheap and Americans believed they ruled the world and all the gas in the world was at their disposal. But when the Japanese arrived with their smaller, fuel-efficient, cheaper and reliable cars, the fortunes started turning at the Three Americans. Chrysler being the smallest was the most affected.


In July 1979, John Riccardo, the then Chrysler chairman, went public with the depth of Chrysler’s difficulties, admitting that Chrysler was bleeding red ink. Second-quarter losses reached $207 million. As summer turned to fall, the news from Chrysler was bleak. Chrysler’s 1979 $1.2 billion loss was the largest recorded in US corporate history. By the end of 1979, the company was teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. Chrysler owed $4 billion, nearly 10% of all US corporate debt. Eighty thousand unsold vehicles worth over $700 million sat on dealer lots. Riccardo called for immediate federal assistance: a $1 billion US tax holiday, a two-year postponement of federal exhaust emission standards (worth $600 million to the company), and concessions from the United Auto Workers. Otherwise, he warned, the company would fail.


Second-quarter losses reached $207 million. As summer turned to fall, the news from Chrysler was bleak. Chrysler’s 1979 $1.2 billion loss was the largest recorded in US corporate history. By the end of 1979, the company was teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. Chrysler owed $4 billion, nearly 10% of all US corporate debt. In seeking funding support, Iacocca and colleagues exhaustively sought assistance prior to the Federal Government eventually coming on board.  At one stage, they examined 156 possible lifelines alone from among the wealthy of Saudi Arabia, the same people the nation annexed the following decade.


Chrysler was in desperate need and going out of business. As soon as Iacocca started building Chrysler from the ground up, he laid off many employees, and sold the plant in Europe . Despite these moves the company was still in dire straights, so Iacocca made an amazing move by asking Congress for a loan. To the surprise to all, he received it. After receiving the loan, Chrysler released the Dodge Aires and Plymouth Reliant automobiles, which were inexpensive and great on fuel economy since the United States was just coming out of an oil shortage.


Iacocca echoed Riccardo warning that without some sort of federal aid, Chrysler would most certainly fail. Chrysler’s impending demise was potentially the largest in history, and for many the company’s crisis represented the end of American postwar economic hegemony and the deindustrialization of North America. As Congress and the Carter administration haggled over the final aspects of a bailout bill, Chrysler faced its darkest days. To avoid running out of money, the company simply stopped paying suppliers. Finally, to the relief of over 250,000 Chrysler workers, in January 1980, President Jimmy Carter signed the bill Chrysler Corporation Loan Guarantee Act of 1979. The plan provided $1.5 billion in loan guarantees, but required the company to secure another $1.43 billion in private financing, concessions from banks and suppliers.


In those days, Iacocca recalls, gas was cheap and Detroit gave little thought to fuel efficiency. The legendary CEO says he's become a big fan of the hybrid cars that Toyota has been marketing for years. The mini-max project for the minivans was also conceived from the success Toyota found in other markets based on minivans. When Lee Iacocca was running Chrysler, he put his "follow-the-market" philosophy behind a product that became the company's cash cow – the minivan. The Minivan till this day brings major revenues for the company. The gas-guzzlers reflected the changing lifestyles of the baby boomers, who traded in their Ford Mustangs for a way to get the kids to soccer practice.


Iacocca was also responsible for the acquisition of AMC (American Motors Corporation) in 1987, which brought over the money making Jeep division. The Jeep division today is the most profitable of all Chrysler divisions now owned by FIAT. He eventually stepped down from Chrysler in 1992 and currently works with a company designing electric bikes.  


The turnaround in Chrysler’s fortunes came swiftly and stunningly. In July 1981, just two years after Riccardo’s fateful admission of Chrysler’s dire financial straits, Iacocca announced that the company had turned a profit for the second quarter. Although it was a meager $11.6 million (compared to the company’s 1979-81 losses of $3 billion), these profits were followed by a tidal wave of income, and in 1983 Chrysler paid off its federally guaranteed loans seven years ahead of schedule. Chrysler’s amazing recovery did seem, indeed, to be a miracle, and there was no doubt who had been the miracle worker behind the turnaround. not with government loans, but with $1.5 billion in loan guarantees. Iacocca repaid the loans ahead of time and the Treasury made a profit of $300 million.

By the 1980s, Iacocca was heralded as a possible presidential candidate; motivational speakers talked about “Lessons from the Great Leaders: From Hannibal to Iacocca.” He was a television celebrity appearing in Chrysler commercials and in an episode of Miami Vice; even a children’s play was written about his amazing story. In 1985, Iacocca wound up on the cover of Time magazine.


Iacocca successfully managed and negotiated the myriad networks of management, unions, suppliers, and banks within the Chrysler constellation to position the company to take advantage of the government loan package. Among Chrysler employees, Iacocca had to fire thousands of managers and salaried staff.

The Future

Lee believes the Detroit's automakers need to move faster on hybrid electric cars. G.M., he added, should have invested in hybrids long ago. They need to make cars that stand out from models that look ready-made for Avis or Hertz lots. Though Chrysler has shown the most tangible signs of success, it faces many of the same fundamental challenges as G.M. and Ford.

Minggu, 15 April 2012

Legends of wheels Part II: Carlos Ghosn

Based on my previous article on Sergio Marchionne here -
http://boyracer.blogspot.com/2012/04/legends-of-wheels-part-isergio.html

Here is part II of 'Legends of Wheels' series based on another legendary icon in the automobile industry - Carlos Ghosn also known as Keiratsu killer, Samurai, Le cost killer, Mr. Fixit, Gaijin Hero and Seven Eleven. Fluent in French, Arabic, English and Portuguese -- and recently Japanese -- Ghosn is the quintessential international businessman. He is not only CEO and president of Nissan and Renault and AvtoVAZ, he is also on the board of Alcoa, Sony and IBM.
 



Born to French family living in Brazil, Carlos Ghosn is Director and CEO of Renault S.A., Nissan Motors and the Renault-Nissan Alliance.  Ghosn began his career in the automobile field by working with Michelin for 18 years which is the largest tyre maker in the world. Ghosn was allocated the South American operations which were unprofitable and was supposed to report directly to Francois Michelin.  Ghosn formed cross-functional management teams to determine best practices among the French, Brazilian and other nationalities working in the South American division.The experience in multicultural Brazil formed the basis of his cross-cultural management style and emphasis on diversity as a core business asset.  The division returned to profitability in two years.


Renault

Renault was losing a billion francs a month and reported a deficit of 12.5 billion in 1984. The government intervened and Georges Besse was installed as chairman; he set about cutting costs dramatically, selling off many of Renault's non-core assets, withdrawing almost entirely from motorsports, and laying off many employees. This succeeded in halving the deficit by 1986, but he was murdered in 1986. He was replaced by Raymond Lévy, who continued along the same lines as Besse, slimming down the company considerably with the result that by the end of 1987 the company was more or less financially stable.


It was eventually decided that the company's state-owned status was detrimental to its growth, and Renault was privatized in 1996 and Carlos Ghosn was brought in. He soon cuased an uproar by shuttering a Renault plant in Belgium and wringing out billions in costs by leaning on suppliers and in-house units alike.

This new freedom allowed the company to venture once again into Eastern Europe and South America, including a new factory in Brazil and upgrades for the infrastructure in Argentina and Turkey. Renault also owns Dacia Motors with 99.43% owned by Renault, AvtoVaz owned 25% by Renault with plans to increase the stake to 50% and Samsung motors with a 80.1% stake.




When Renault CEO Louis Schweitzer ponied up $5 billion to buy effective control of Nissan that year, there was skepticism to say the least. Industry wags such as Robert Lutz, currently vice-chairman of General Motors Corp., publicly stated that Renault might as well have dumped the billions in the Pacific ocean. Into the breach came Carlos Ghosn, a savage cost-cutter and first-class intellect. But even he gave this salvage job only a 50-50 chance before leaving for Japan.

Renault Nissan Alliance

Renault-Nissan Alliance is a strategic partnership between Paris-based Renault and Yokohama, Japan-based Nissan, which together sell more than one in 10 cars worldwide. The companies, which have been strategic partners since 1999, have nearly 350,000 employees and control six major brands: Renault, Nissan, Infiniti, Renault Samsung Motors, Dacia and Lada. They sold about 8 million cars in nearly 200 countries in 2011, behind General Motors and Volkswagen for total volume. The strategic partnership between Renault and Nissan is not a merger or an acquisition.


The two companies are joined together through a cross-shareholding agreement. The structure was unique in the auto industry during the 1990s consolidation trend and later served as a model for General Motors and PSA Peugeot Citroën, PSA Peugeot Citroën and Mitsubishi, and Volkswagen and Suzuk, though the later combination failed. The Alliance itself has broadened its scope substantially, forming additional partnerships with automakers including Germany's Daimler, China's Dongfeng Motor, and Russia's AvtoVAZ.


Renault currently has a 44.3 percent stake in Nissan, and Nissan holds a 15 percent stake in Renault. Ghosn has compared the Renault-Nissan partnership to a marriage: "A couple does not assume a converged, single identity when they get married. Instead, they retain their own individuality and join to build a life together, united by shared interests and goals, each bringing something different to the union. The goal of the Alliance is to increase economies of scale for both Renault and Nissan without forcing one company's identity to be consumed by the other's. The Alliance achieves scale and speeds time to market by jointly developing engines, batteries and other key components. For instance, Renault builds nearly all of the diesel engines in Nissan cars sold in Europe. Nissan’s market share increases in Europe have been a result of badging various Renault van models such as the Renault Kangoo/Nissan Kubistar, Renault Master/Nissan Interstar, Renault Trafic/Nissan Primastar.


The Alliance also oversees purchasing for both companies, ensuring larger volume and thus better pricing with suppliers. The Alliance reported more than €1.5 billion in synergies in 2010. At the time it was created, Renault bought 36.8 percent of Nissan's outstanding stock, and Nissan vowed to buy into Renault when it was financially able. In 2001, after the company's turnaround from near-bankruptcy, Nissan bought a 15 percent stake in Renault, which in turn increased its stake in Nissan to 44.4 percent. The alliance has invested heavily in developing car markets such as India, Russia, Brazil and China.




In September 2009, Avtovaz announced plans to cut 27,600 jobs, more than a quarter of its workforce, after having been rescued from bankruptcy by a 20bn-rouble bailout from then Prime Minister Vladimir Putin during spring that year. with the Russian market having bounced back, there is a renewed willingness to invest. The Renault Nissan Alliance pumped money in the company for a 25% share.




A new production line was inaugurated last week in the Togliatti plant, backed by a 400m-euro ($525m; £330m) investment, and plans are in place to produce not only Ladas here, but Renault and Nissan models too. Lada and its Japanese and French alliance partners currently command a 33% market share in Russia. One major hurdle remains, however, namely Mr Ghosn's ambition to take a majority stake in Avtovaz. Deliveries by the two car companies and their Russian Partner AvtoVaz rose to 8.03 million vehicles in 2011, up from 7.28 million in 2010.

Reviving Nissan Motors

Nissan is one of the major car makers from Japan. Nissan became the second largest car manufacturer in 2011, surpassing Honda with Toyota still very much the dominant first. Along with its normal range of models, Nissan also produces a range of luxury models branded as Infiniti.


In 1999, with Nissan facing severe financial difficulties, Nissan entered an alliance with Renault S.A. of France. Renault purchased a 36.8 percent stake in Nissan. While maintaining his roles at Renault, Ghosn joined Nissan as its chief operating officer in June 1999, became its president in June 2000 and chief executive officer in June 2001. Under CEO Ghosn's "Nissan Revival Plan", the company has rebounded in what many leading economists consider to be one of the most spectacular corporate turnarounds in history, catapulting Nissan to record profits and a dramatic revitalization of both its Nissan and Infiniti model line-ups.

 
He took plenty of flak after slashing more than 20,000 jobs and closing assembly plants. When he joined the company, Nissan had debt of $20 billion and only three of its 48 models were generating a profit -- and reversing the company's sinking fortunes was considered "mission impossible.". Ghosn promised to resign if the company did not reach profitability by the end of the year, and claimed that Nissan would have no net debt by 2005. Ghosn determined that he had to slash purchasing costs by 20%, reduce capacity by 30%, close five plants and displace 20,000 odd-workers through lay-offs and attrition. An American CEO could do much of that in months, not so in Japan. In the late 90's, its public viewed the sale of national champions to foreigners akin to treason. Nissan belonged to a massic keiretsu -- a web of business alliances -- in which stability trumped sound financial management. It had billions of yen tied up in cross-shareholdings with suppliers and keiretsu partners. He also auctioned off prized assets such as Nissan's aerospace unit. 


His radical methods would make him a “target of public outrage,” according to the Wall Street Journal. However, in one year, Nissan's net profit climbed to $2.7 billion from a loss of $6.1 billion in the previous year. Twelve months into his three-year turnaround plan, Ghosn had Nissan back in the black, and within three years it was one of the industry's most profitable auto makers, with operating margins consistently above 9% -- more than twice the industry average. Nissan's operating profit (EBIT, or earnings before interest and taxes) margin increased from 1.38% in FY 2000 to 9.25% in FY 2006.


He ended Nissan's reliance on an interwoven web of parts suppliers with cross-holdings in Nissan—a Japanese operating model called "keiretsu." He changed the official company language from Japanese to English and included executives from Europe and North America in key global strategy sessions for the first time.


In May 2005, Ghosn was named president and chief executive officer of Renault. When he assumed the CEO roles at both Renault and Nissan, Ghosn became the world's first person to run two companies on the Fortune Global 500 simultaneously. Post tsunami in Japan Ghosn has remained committed to building at least 1 million of Nissan's cars and trucks in Japan annually. Ghosn's ambitious recovery timeline -- with complete rebuilding of all damaged plants, and full production expected to be restored by October 2011 -- has put Nissan ahead of competitors such as Toyota.


Ghosn wrote a best-selling business book called "Shift: Inside Nissan's Historic Revival." He was the subject of another business book called "Turnaround: How Carlos Ghosn Rescued Nissan" by David Magee. Ghosn has also been responsible for Nissan's revival of the GT-R Skyline brand name with the 2007 Nissan GT-R which has successfully beaten the best performance cars from other Japanese stables incluiding the Mitsubishi Lancer EVO X FQ-400 and Subaru Impreza WRX STI


Nissan Leaf

When Carlos Ghosn  announced dedicating$5 billion to bring the Nissan Leaf  (and numerous derivative electric cars based on the Leaf's architecture) to market—a gamble that prompted Business Week to ask whether he was "crazy." Not long ago, Nissan was being pilloried for a lineup with few hybrid options, as well as CEO Carlos Ghosn's stubborn insistence on investing in unproven all-electric technology. Among the skeptics: his own employees. The zero-emission Leaf, which Nissan began delivering in late 2010 in the United States and Japan, is the world's first  mass-produced electric vehicle. 
As per Carlos Ghosn the first electric cars were awful. They were selling for $100,000. Then there is the Volt, which is $40,000. This is $25,000 [after government incentives].


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Ghosn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_Samsung_Motors
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_Dacia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AvtoVAZ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault-Nissan_Alliance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan

Selasa, 03 Januari 2012

Ford and GM to Mahindra and Tata: The power shift

Automobiles have been part of history of every country since the beginning of 1900's. Sweden too had Volvo (founded in 1927) at Gothenberg And Saab (founded in 1947) at Trollhattan making their marks all over the world through quality engineering and providing employment all over the country. Jaguar on the other hand was founded in Britain in 1922 when car manufacturing was at its peak. LandRover was just one model under the  After the fall of the likes of Austin, Morris, Standard, BMC, Triumph, Land Rover and many others, what remained was niche manufacturers like Jaguar, Aston Martin, Lotus and Bentley sales of whom do not even touch 10,000 units per annum.Volvo was introduced by SKF as a subsidiary while Saab was introduced by Saab Aerospace as a diversified unit. Volvo was known for safety and Saab was known for its performance cars while Jaguar was a luxury notch above the Germans. During the peak of American Automobile revolution, Saab was purchased by General Motors (GM) in 1989 and Volvo and Jaguar were purchased by Ford in 1999. Land Rover passed through the hands of Leyland, BMC, British Aerospace and  BMW ultimately landing in the hands of Ford. The parent companies of both Swedish brands were looking to focus on their main stream business leading to the sale while the lazy butted Americans wanted ready made technology to be bought by their treasuries which prints US dollar bills 24X7. Jaguar and Land Rover on the other hand were the remnants of a fallen British car industry.


Ford was early to enter recession but Mr. Alan Mullaly had foresight and decided to get Aston Martin, Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo off their hands. General Motors being bigger in size was also a more corrupt corporation. Directors took heavy pays and left the company draining it of cash and leading into bankruptcy. While Hummer, Pontiac and Saturn died, Saab did find a desperate buyer. A Chinese company named Geely which makes cars using plagiarized technology purchased Volvo while Spyker cars owned by an alleged Russian mobster by GM Vladimir Antonov and Victor Muller purchased Saab. Indian carmaker Tata which was flush with money and wanted knowhow in premium cars purchased Jaguar Land Rover. Now After Spyker cars has failed to revive Saab, Mahindra has shown interest in buying Saab. The concentration of power in the Automotive field has shown a definitive shift from the United States to India. Will TATA and Mahindra repeat the same story that GM and Ford wrote in the 19th century?





Geely is one of the premier Chinese car makers. China has thrived worldwide making cheap imitation products of inferior quality. Wal-mart survives by filling its stores with 99% Chinese products. But off late after growing in size, Geely has been looking outside for quality and knowhow in car manufactury. Volvo happened at the right time in 2008. The motives behind purchase by Ford and Geely might seem same but are not. Ford purchased Volvo along with a stake in Mazda to make its own cars successful. Ford Focus, Ford Kuga and Ford C-Max were successfully built on Volvo C1 platform which also comprised of the Volvo S40, V50, C70 and C30. Geely on the other hand is looking to make a transition to Volvo completely.




Similarly Volvo S80, V70, XC70, XC60, S60 and V60 shared platform with Ford S-max, Ford Galaxy, and Ford Mondeo were based on Volvo Y20 platform. Unlike GM though Ford made no hassles for Geely while giving away Volvo which was a mutual favour. Ford was desperate for cash and buying Volvo was something no major car maker would do since Ford had completely drained all its technology for its own cars. Geely on the other hand knew that a Chinese Brand name would not get it a sound footing outside China and needed a strong brand name. The deal was set. But unfortunately Geely's ambitious plans are a bit larger than What Volvo can accomodate and bit more mainstream for a semi luxury brand. Geely wants to be amongst the major car makers in the world by selling Volvo as a mainstream product. Volvo on the other hand has always had a luxurious image. Not unlike the big three (Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW) but still above the likes of GM, Toyota, Honda, Ford and Hyundai. At the moment Volvo's new design philosophy and its precedence in safety, technology and luxury has helped the company reach sales targets but Geely is going to find it the hard way how tough it can be to build a luxury brand. Possibly a compromise they are aware of and are willing to make.


Similar to Volvo, Tata also got a clean sale by Ford. Alan Mullaly had been in talks for sometime to sell of Jaguar and Land Rover as separate brands. Tata Motors has been in the business in India for only two decades. Known mostly for its Indica cabs, the company hardly had any international presence apart from a dealer here or there. Tata Motors as a corporation is one of the biggest in the world and hence, When the time came in snatching up Jaguar for its sedan business and Land Rover for its UV's, Tata was quick to react. Ford purchased the rights to Rover Name worldwide (Rover, MG Rover, Land Rover) to be transferred with the deal. The $3 billion deal was once considered as too much for Jaguar and Land Rover which collectively hardly sold enough cars under Ford. Today JLR sells close to 20,000 units a month.


 Unlike Volvo, Tata has successfully built the Jaguar Land Rover Marque as a luxury marque above the Big three German Marque's which is a feat in itself. Additionally, instead of stripping the cars, the british factory was given the freedom to operate and innovate and build upon its own cars. Today, Jaguar Land Rover is a profit making brand for Tata Motors surprising even the who's who at Ford Motor company. Tata also has slowly learnt to build its own cars more efficiently which is evident in the new Tata Aria. But Tata is yet to exploit the concept of platform sharing especially since there is a huge gap between Tata brand of cars and Jaguar Land Rover cars since Tata is known for the cheapest car in the world (Tata Nano) while Jaguar Land Rover pitch their cars above most Luxurious brands. The best proof that Jaguar Land Rover is a successful brand today is its increasing number of dealers globally and the announcement to actually produce a concept super car (Jaguar C-X16).



Saab's history separates itself from Volvo since the time GM purchased it. GM was quick to transfer knowhow to their American tin cans. But Saab had nothing of importance to learn from GM in return. Though smaller in scale, The Trollhattan based company made better cars in every aspect than the corrupt corporation, which was once the largest car maker in the world. After, stripping Saab for a decade Gm left it to fend for itself. A saab 9-5 launched in 1997 was sold unchanged for 14 years. Surprising, since even mainstream brands like Toyota refreshes their models every year. Such a practice is a strict no-no especially at the luxury end of the market. A Saab 9-3 with minor updates was also sold for 14 years. With only two mainstream cars in its portfolio and half-hearted attempts such as 9-2(Subaru based) and 9-7(Based on old GM platform) Saab was accused of not earning profit except for one year in eleven years. The govt. supported bankruptcy which was but only a curtain on the billions of U.S. taxpayers money mishandled by the top management meant that Saab, Saturn, Pontiac and Hummer had to go. The deal with Koeniggsegg going awry was a giveaway how GM wanted to kill the brand and keep the skeletons inside the box. BAIC (Chinese car maker) quickly purchased the old 9-5 and 9-3 tooling and those interested in reviving the brand reduced to a handful.


 But a desperate Victor Muller and Vladimir Antonov worked out a deal to keep the company up for two decades. But The new management were not an honest bunch either. While the company was struggling to regain lost ground, the new management again was taking fat paychecks while delaying wages. The company soon went under receivership in December 2011 after GM blocked a Chinese deal that could've saved the company. Reason given by GM was that they feared the Chinese Company would compete with GM posing a threat (Which they didn't think while selling the 9-5 9-3 technology to BAIC).


 While GM's Corruption drama with SAAB was unfolding, not the whole world has been a spectator. Apart from Youngman Lotus from China which is rumoured to have lost a couple of hundred Billion Euros, an Indian company has also been studying the proceedings closely. Mahindra known mostly as a UV maker before they tied up with Renault for a small car has expressed interest in buying SAAB. Mahindra learnt things the hard way when their outdated UV'S found it tough to compete but has been quick to utilize its financial standing comprising of strong liquidity. Kinetic's two wheeler business, Logan platform, Reva's electric car business and Korea based Ssangyong Car company which makes cars based on Mercedes-Benz platforms soon found themselves under Mahindra's umbrella. From making three decade old Willy's based UV's, Mahindra has come a long way in the last ten years making cars like the Scorpio, Xylo, Thar and XUV500.


SAAB can prove to be an important landmark for Mahindra since they need a premium brand (Just like TATA built upon with Jaguar) to team it with Ssangyong which has reliable and competent platform but lacks visibility and brand image. Ssangyong's vehicles have been known for their quality and workmanship especially in the UV field. SAAB's worldwide recognition for Mahindra can prove to be a boon. While the chinese have salvaged whatever remained of the technology (GM didn't oppose when Youngman Lotus purchased rights to build cars on the Phoenix architecture), Mahindra seems to be more interested in the brand image itself. Buying SAAB also makes sense since the Plant in Trollhattan will be available for much cheaper along with the tooling now that the company is bankrupt. Integrating Ssangyong cars along with SAAB can prove to be just another Jaguar-Land Rover for Mahindra where Saab makes Luxury cars competing with the Big three German marques and Ssangyong makes UV's on the premium end. Incase, Mahindra misses the point, SAAB has a superlative meaning in Indian languages. (SAAB: Means Master in Hindi and other South Asian Languages)




With the Indian Makers lapping up brands, it is clear that the power reigning in the hands of Americans has clearly moved to India. Mahindra and Tata are creating brand corporations just the way GM once did with Chevrolet, Buick, Cadillac, GMC, Saturn, Pontiac, Hummer, Saab, Opel, Vauxhall and Holden and Ford did with Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Aston Martin, Volvo and Land Rover. How Mahindra and TATA progress learning from the American Big Three's debacles in the 19th century remains to be seen.